Hormone Therapy Linked to
Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Tue Apr 2,
5:39 PM ET
|
|
|
However, the increase in risk is relatively modest and
should be weighed against the potential health benefits of hormone replacement,
according to Dr. Tomas Riman, from
"We advocate cautious interpretation of our results and do not recommend changes to current hormone replacement therapy prescribing practices," Riman and colleagues report in the April 3rd issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (news - web sites).
"For women to make an informed decision on whether or not to use hormone replacement therapy, all beneficial and adverse hormonal aspects concerning osteoporosis, coronary heart disease, venous thrombosis (blood clot formation) and other health effects must be addressed," they add.
In the study, the researchers compared 655 women with ovarian cancer to nearly 4,000 healthy women the same age. All the women were 50 to 74 years of age.
Compared with women who had never used estrogen replacement therapy, women who took estrogen alone were at increased risk of ovarian cancer.
Women who used estrogen with sequentially added progestins--a cyclic regimen of the second hormone--were also at an increased risk of ovarian cancer compared with women who had never used estrogen.
However, women who used hormone replacement therapy with continuously (daily) added progestins were no more likely to develop ovarian cancer than those who never had used hormones. Taking estrogen alone is know to increase the risk of cancer of the uterine lining, so most women now also take progestin, a synthetic form of the hormone progesterone, as part of hormone replacement therapy.
The greatest increased risk of ovarian cancer was seen among women who had used estrogen with sequentially added progestins for more than 10 years.
However, the researchers note that the possible increase in risk is still relatively modest. Of 1,000 women taking estrogen alone or in combination with sequential progestin, 2 to 3 might develop ovarian cancer as a result of the treatment.
SOURCE: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002;94:497-504